CVE-2025-29824: The Windows CLFS Zero-Day Threat Explained

The Windows Common Log File System (CLFS) zero-day vulnerability has sent shockwaves through the cybersecurity community – and for good reason. Tracked as CVE-2025-29824, this critical use‐after‐free flaw in the CLFS kernel driver enables attackers with standard user privileges to escalate their rights to full system control. Cybercriminals, notably a ransomware group identified as Storm-2460, have exploited this vulnerability as part of a multi-stage attack that leverages obfuscated methods, sophisticated memory corruption techniques, and stealthy post-exploitation maneuvers. Here’s an in‐depth look at how the attack unfolds, its broader implications, and exactly what Windows administrators should do to stay secure.

A Deep Dive into the Vulnerability​

At its core, the CLFS zero-day vulnerability stems from a memory management flaw. The Windows CLFS driver, responsible for handling system log files, fails to properly validate memory after releasing it. This “dangling pointer” scenario allows cybercriminals to manipulate freed memory and hijack the system’s execution flow, effectively granting elevated privileges. In a world where even minor memory allocation mistakes can have catastrophic consequences, the exploitation of a kernel-level component like CLFS represents a severe threat to system integrity.
Key technical highlights include:

• CVE-2025-29824 is a use-after-free vulnerability, allowing attackers to overwrite process tokens using the RtlSetAllBits API, elevating the process’s privileges to privileged SYSTEM levels .
• The exploitation process starts with leaking kernel addresses via the NtQuerySystemInformation API. Notably, enhanced security on Windows 11 version 24H2 restricts access to certain system information classes, mitigating the risk for up-to-date systems .

Sophisticated Exploitation Techniques Employed​

The attack chain in this incident unfolds in several distinct phases—from pre-exploitation tactics to full-blown ransomware deployment.

Pre-Exploitation and Initial Foothold​

Before launching the core memory corruption attack, the threat actors establish a foothold by abusing legitimate Windows utilities:

• Abuse of Legitimate Tools: Attackers use the Windows certutil utility to download what appears to be a legitimate file from a compromised third-party website. This file is, in reality, a malicious MSBuild file that goes through a decryption routine via the EnumCalendarInfoA API callback .
• Concealed Payload: The downloaded MSBuild file is carefully constructed to hide the payload that eventually unfolds as PipeMagic malware—a tool previously documented by researchers and linked to earlier exploits .

The Memory Corruption Exploit​

Once the malicious payload is in place, the core exploitation begins:

• Memory Leak and Corruption: The attack manipulates the NtQuerySystemInformation API to leak kernel addresses, setting the stage for memory corruption. Following this, the RtlSetAllBits API overwrites the process token with 0xFFFFFFFF, essentially granting the exploit full administrator or SYSTEM-level control .
• File System Artefact: During the exploit, a telltale CLFS BLF file is created at C:\ProgramData\SkyPDF\PDUDrv.blf. This file serves as an important indicator of compromise (IOC) for security teams tracking the intrusion .

Post-Exploitation Activities and Ransomware Deployment​

After successfully elevating privileges, the attackers proceed to consolidate their control:

• Payload Injection: The malicious code is injected into essential Windows processes such as winlogon.exe, ensuring persistence and deeper system integration.
• Credential Dumping: Using Sysinternals’ procdump.exe, the threat actors dump memory from the LSASS process to harvest user credentials. With these credentials, lateral movement within the network is made significantly easier .
• Ransomware Deployment: Custom commands are executed to disable recovery efforts – commands like 'bcdedit /set {default} recoveryenabled no', 'wbadmin delete catalog -quiet', and even the use of a .onion domain in the ransom note hint at a possible connection to known ransomware families .

Industry Impact and Broader Security Implications​

The exploitation of CVE-2025-29824 is not confined to a single industry—the attacks have targeted diverse sectors:

• Geographical and Sector Diversity: Key targets include IT and real estate companies in the United States, financial institutions in Venezuela, software firms in Spain, and retail organizations in Saudi Arabia. This diverse targeting underscores the broad appeal and wide impact of the vulnerability.
• Evolving Ransomware Tactics: By using classic tools like certutil and msbuild, and combining them with in-memory exploitation techniques, the attackers exemplify how traditional system utilities can be repurposed for sophisticated cyberattacks. This mirrors trends observed in other recent Windows zero-days .

In broader terms, the incident is a wake-up call that even core components long considered secure can harbor vulnerabilities ripe for exploitation. Organizations must adopt a multi-layered defense strategy, integrating rapid patch deployment with advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems.

Key Mitigation Strategies​

Microsoft’s response to the threat has been proactive. Security patches were released on April 8, 2025 – and it is crucial that all customers apply these updates immediately. For systems running Windows 11 version 24H2, enhanced restrictions on system calls provide an added layer of defense. However, patching alone is not enough. Organizations should consider the following measures:

• Immediate Patch Deployment:
• Ensure that all endpoints and servers receive the latest Microsoft security updates. This is the first line of defense against exploitation.
• Enhanced Endpoint and Network Security:
• Enable cloud-delivered protection in Microsoft Defender Antivirus for real-time threat analysis.
• Deploy robust endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems, configured in block mode to proactively hinder malicious activity.
• Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint’s automated investigation features and enforce attack surface reduction rules.
• Continuous Monitoring and Incident Response:
• Monitor for IOCs, such as the presence of the PDUDrv.blf file at C:\ProgramData\SkyPDF, or suspicious use of dllhost.exe – typical signs of an ongoing compromise .
• Regularly review privileged account configurations and enforce the principle of minimum privilege across the enterprise.
• Threat Hunting and Network Segmentation:
• Employ threat hunting queries to detect abnormal activities that might indicate a breach.
• Segment networks to reduce lateral movement in case one part of the system becomes compromised.

Recognizing Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)​

Given the advanced nature of the attack, a successful defense relies on the timely identification of compromise indicators. Here are some of the key IOCs to monitor:

• File indicators: A suspicious BLF file at C:\ProgramData\SkyPDF\PDUDrv.blf is one of the first red flags.
• Command-line anomalies: Unusual invocation of processes like dllhost.exe with commands such as “–do [path_to_ransom]” can be an early sign of exploitation.
• System modifications: Commands intended to disable recovery options (e.g., “bcdedit /set {default} recoveryenabled no”) hint at subsequent malicious activity aimed at thwarting remediation efforts.
• Authentication anomalies: Memory dumps of LSASS, facilitated by Sysinternals’ procdump.exe, can signal ongoing credential harvesting activities .

These indicators, along with other behavioral anomalies, underscore the need for rigorous log monitoring and periodic security audits.

The Way Forward: Building a Resilient Security Posture​

The Windows CLFS zero-day attack is a stark reminder that no system is ever completely immune to exploitation—even those components constructed with security in mind. For IT administrators and security professionals, this incident calls for:

• A robust patch management program that ensures vulnerabilities are patched promptly.
• An investment in both traditional and next-generation security tools to detect and mitigate threats as they evolve.
• Comprehensive incident response planning that prepares organizations for multi-stage attacks that combine privilege escalation with ransomware deployment.

While Microsoft’s swift release of security updates provides an essential safety net, organizations must adopt a multi-layered approach that includes advanced threat detection, regular vulnerability assessments, and proactive network segmentation. Only then can the intricate web of modern exploitation be effectively countered.

Conclusion​

In an era where cyberattacks are growing more sophisticated by the day, the exploitation of the Windows CLFS kernel driver via CVE-2025-29824 is a compelling example of the complex challenges facing modern IT environments. From cleverly abusing legitimate tools like certutil to deploying well-camouflaged malware and even orchestrating ransomware attacks, threat actors are continuously sharpening their arsenals. This case highlights that even a small window of vulnerability, if left unpatched, can grant attackers nearly unfettered control over a system.
Organizations must view the recent patch as a call to reinforce their defenses, ensuring that systems are not only patched but also fortified with advanced detection and incident response systems. By staying informed and connected to trusted cybersecurity updates and advisories, Windows administrators can significantly reduce their risk exposure in a relentless threat landscape .
Staying ahead of malicious actors means continuously reevaluating security postures, embracing best practices, and ensuring that every layer of the defense mechanism is robust, resilient, and ready for the next wave of threats. For those managing Windows environments, the lesson is clear: rapid patching and layered security are your best allies in the fight against ever-evolving cyber threats.

---

Source: CybersecurityNews Windows CLFS Zero-Day Vulnerability Actively Exploited by Ransomware Group