• Thread Author
In an era where operating system loyalties often evoke fervent debates, a public admission by Merill Fernando, Product Manager at Microsoft, that macOS better suits his workflow than Windows 11, has ignited both reflection and controversy across tech circles. Such candor from a core member of the Windows team is striking, offering a revealing glimpse into the realities of professional productivity within major software giants. This rare perspective not only challenges long-standing assumptions about OS preferences within Microsoft’s own ranks, but also spotlights the shifting landscape of personal and enterprise computing.

A workspace with two laptops, one displaying code and the other showing a Windows 11 wallpaper.
The Candid Admission: A Microsoft Product Manager Turns to macOS​

Merill Fernando’s openness surfaced on social media, quickly gaining traction after he detailed his experience returning to macOS following a stint on Windows 11. Despite his professional alignment with Microsoft’s flagship OS, Fernando described the transition back to macOS as a relief, noting that working on Windows felt “frustrating.” This sentiment, particularly coming from a Microsoft insider, resonated widely—appealing to users who themselves quietly experiment or outright prefer competing platforms for specific needs.
Fernando’s workflow is emblematic of a modern, pragmatic approach to technology—one that values efficiency and comfort over brand allegiance. While he maintains access to essential Microsoft services, his main company-issued device is a MacBook, and for personal endeavors such as podcasting, his newsletter, and open-source contributions, he leverages a Mac Studio. Rather than seeing these choices as a rejection of his employer’s ecosystem, Fernando employs a strategic blend, integrating critical Microsoft services and tools into his Apple-centric setup.

The Modern Hybrid Workflow: Mac at the Center, Microsoft at the Periphery​

Fernando’s daily setup isn’t about abandoning Microsoft for Apple; it’s about harnessing the best of both worlds. Instead of relying solely on Windows hardware or native installations, he makes extensive use of remote access and virtualization:
  • Windows Services on macOS: Using the Windows App for macOS, Fernando remotely accesses Windows-based services and even Surface devices. This ensures that any tool exclusive to Windows remains within reach, without sacrificing his preferred macOS environment.
  • Virtualization with Parallels: To further bridge gaps, he runs Windows virtual machines using Parallels, providing the flexibility to test software, access legacy applications, or perform tasks best suited to Windows without leaving the macOS ecosystem.
This hybrid approach isn’t unique to Fernando; it mirrors a wider reality among developers, IT pros, and creative professionals who frequently straddle multiple platforms to maximize productivity. What sets Fernando’s story apart is the open acknowledgment—and implicit validation—of cross-platform workflows at the highest levels of Microsoft itself.

Productivity Anchored by macOS Tools—With Microsoft in the Mix​

A crucial element in Fernando’s workflow is his adoption of macOS-specific productivity tools that, in his view, streamline daily operations and enhance the overall user experience. He cites several key applications and platforms:
  • Raycast: Serving as a command center, Raycast lets Fernando swiftly access and control apps such as Microsoft Teams, Outlook, VSCode, and Terminal, all while utilizing custom keyboard mappings. This level of integration and speed is something he finds particularly advantageous on macOS.
  • Browsers by Context: For work-related tasks, he opts for Microsoft Edge, leveraging its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem. Meanwhile, his personal browsing is handled by Arc, a browser designed for organization and workflow optimization.
  • Terminal Choices: While he previously used Hyper, Fernando now prefers Ghostty for Terminal sessions, suggesting that even essential developer tools see iteration and refinement in his quest for the most intuitive experience.
At a broader level, Fernando’s blend of software highlights the appeal of macOS as a unifying platform that absorbs and elevates tools from different development philosophies.

System Stability, Intuitiveness, and the Evolving User Experience​

One of the core reasons Fernando gravitates toward macOS is its perceived system stability and intuitiveness. Apple’s reputation for delivering a seamless, polished user experience—marked by predictable system behavior, thoughtful UI design, and strong integration across hardware and software—is a recurring theme in user testimonials, and Fernando’s narrative echoes this sentiment.
For professionals juggling complex projects, time-consuming troubleshooting or interruptions can undermine productivity. macOS’s ability to “just work” is, for many, a compelling differentiator. While Windows 11 introduces a host of improvements aimed at modernizing its interface and core systems (including enhanced visual coherence, deeper cloud integration, and a more centralized Settings app), it still faces criticism in areas such as forced updates, driver compatibility, and occasional fragmentation of features—a particular pain point for power users accustomed to granular control or consistency.

Strengths and Shortcomings: A Balanced View​

To fully grapple with the significance of Fernando’s comments, it’s important to critically examine both the strengths of macOS that appeal to demanding users and the current shortcomings that can hamper Windows 11’s appeal, especially in professional contexts.

Notable Strengths of macOS for Professionals​

  • Consistent User Experience: Apple’s vertically integrated approach means hardware and software updates are tightly coordinated. Users benefit from predictable upgrades, minimal bloatware, and less risk of vendor conflict.
  • Reliable System Updates: macOS updates, while not without their own caveats, are often less disruptive. Apple tends to balance rapid rollouts with stability, reducing the anxiety around forced restarts or surprise feature removals.
  • Developer-Centric Features: Tools like Raycast, Ghostty, and a Unix-based subsystem make macOS a favorite for developers—especially those working in open-source, web development, or cross-platform environments.
  • Refined Multitasking and Window Management: Features like Mission Control, multiple desktops, and recent improvements to window snapping contribute to efficient multitasking.
  • Privacy and Security Posture: Apple continues to tout robust privacy features, with an OS architecture that makes it less susceptible to certain types of malware and data leakage compared to Windows’ broader ecosystem.

Persistent Challenges for Windows 11​

  • Legacy Support vs. Modernization: Windows’ strength—its broad hardware and software compatibility—can also be a weakness. Supporting a massive range of devices and legacy applications often introduces complexity, security headaches, and occasional UI inconsistencies.
  • Update Frustrations: Even with overhauls to Windows Update, complaints around forced restarts, slow rollouts, and patch reliability persist, particularly in enterprise settings.
  • Bloatware and Preinstallations: Many OEMs ship Windows devices with unnecessary applications, which can clutter the user experience and introduce redundant services.
  • Fragmentation in Settings and Control Panels: While Windows 11 aims for consolidation, remnants of older interfaces (the classic Control Panel, legacy dialog boxes) still appear, breaking immersion and adding confusion, especially for newer users.
That said, not all is lost for Windows. Its continued dominance in business environments, gaming, and customizability ensures it remains the default for millions. Furthermore, Microsoft’s growing investments in cross-platform and open-source technologies (e.g., WSL, VSCode, Azure) keep it relevant—and even indispensable—in many workflows.

The Realities and Risks of Cross-Platform Workflows​

Fernando’s approach—using macOS as his base while seamlessly accessing the Microsoft stack—is instructive for today’s professionals, but it’s not without risks and trade-offs.

Technical Challenges​

  • Compatibility and Performance Penalties: Although tools like Parallels and the Windows App for macOS bridge functionality, they introduce overhead. Virtual machines can’t match native performance, especially for graphics-intensive or hardware-accelerated tasks. Remote access adds latency, and not all hardware features (such as advanced GPU options or certain USB peripherals) are available through emulation.
  • Licensing and IT Policy Hurdles: In enterprise settings, using non-standard hardware or virtualization solutions can collide with IT department policies or licensing restrictions, especially in highly regulated industries.

Security and Data Privacy​

The more environments and access points, the greater the attack surface. While Apple and Microsoft invest heavily in endpoint security, cross-platform setups must be rigorously managed to avoid vulnerabilities—particularly as data flows across OS boundaries via shared drives, remote desktops, or synchronized services.

User Support and Troubleshooting​

Power users like Fernando typically have the skills to troubleshoot and optimize intricate setups. Less technical employees may struggle with the complexity of hybrid workflows, increasing support costs, or causing frustration if integrations fail or are not officially supported.

Industry Implications: What Does This Mean for the Future of Windows?​

That a senior Microsoft employee publicly prefers macOS isn’t simply a quirky anecdote—it’s a signal of deeper trends in professional computing:
  • Platform Loyalty Is Fading: Today’s workforce demands flexibility. As cloud-based services, cross-platform development, and open standards proliferate, users are less constrained by a single operating system. Companies are under increasing pressure to support employees’ choices to retain talent and foster innovation.
  • Microsoft’s Transition to Service Provider: Microsoft’s own evolution is evident in its emphasis on subscription-based services, such as Microsoft 365, Azure, and platform-agnostic apps like Teams and Outlook. The focus is expanding from Windows as a product to Microsoft as a service ecosystem—one that must play well with macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android.
  • Competitive Pressure Is Healthy: The willingness of professionals to explore outside the Microsoft ecosystem will continue to drive innovation. Windows 11, while a step forward in usability and aesthetics, has much to learn from macOS’s streamlined approach, just as Apple can benefit from Microsoft’s interoperability and commitment to openness.

A Call for User-Centered Design​

Ultimately, Fernando’s experience is a reminder to tech companies everywhere: User needs and workflows should dictate technology choices, not the other way around. While passionate communities will always debate the merits of Windows versus macOS, the future belongs to platforms that prioritize adaptability, seamless integration, and a relentless focus on user productivity.
Windows 11 is evolving, and its hybrid features—such as enhanced virtualization, improved Linux support through WSL, and new integrations with Azure—hold real promise for bridging the remaining gaps. Yet, as stories like Fernando’s make clear, the edge for macOS remains in the details: polish, predictability, and a frictionless path from idea to execution.

Conclusion: Lessons from the Inside​

The admissions of Merill Fernando offer more than a talking point for technology forums—they crystallize an ongoing shift within the software industry. As boundaries blur between platforms and cloud services flatten distinctions in productivity tooling, the true winner is the user empowered to build a workflow that works. Windows 11 and macOS will continue to jockey for dominance in professional settings, but the voices from inside Microsoft itself suggest that genuine choice, and the ability to blend the best of both worlds, is the key to future innovation.
For Windows enthusiasts and Microsoft itself, embracing this reality—by learning from user pain points, streamlining system complexities, and doubling down on cross-platform excellence—may not only stem defections but also foster a more resilient, user-driven future. As the OS landscape continues to evolve, transparency and adaptability will be the real hallmarks of next-generation computing success.

Source: Absolute Geeks https://www.absolutegeeks.com/article/featured/microsoft-product-manager-admits-macos-fits-his-workflow-better-than-windows-11/
 

Back
Top