Korea’s Start-Up Struggle: Breaking Red Tape to Build a Global Innovation Hub

No country ever got rich, interesting, or globally relevant by perfecting red tape—yet in South Korea’s exuberant start-up scene, the emotional weather report is still “regulation with a chance of exasperation.” Beneath Seoul’s neon skyline, in chic glass-walled spaces like Maru 360, founders are rehearsing a familiar but intensifying chorus: set us free, unchain us from old regulations, and let us build the next Miracle on the Han River—but digitally, with a hoodie wardrobe and the global ambitions of a Silicon Valley IPO party.

Founders on the Front Lines: The Start-Up Scream​

Picture this: a host of dogged CEOs, including faces behind Pinda, Mompyeonhansesang, Channel Corporation, Codit, Mobition, and Ellis Group—each wrangling a start-up that’s already sprinted past the “will this even work?” phase—gather for a candid showdown at the Korea Startup Forum. There’s no pop-and-circumstance, no stirring orchestral medley; just a gritted-teeth consensus that the ecosystem is straining at its seams.
Their message to presidential hopefuls is simple: we don’t need another rosy promise about the “AI era” or glib talk about unleashing innovation. We need an actionable playbook, with fewer poetic metaphors and more technocratic hustle. “Support” is nice, but “how-to-support” and “remove-these-obstacles-immediately” would be even better.

K-Pop, K-Drama… K-Red Tape?​

Let’s get one misconception out of the way: Korea’s unicorn ecosystem is not a barren wasteland. In fact, Korean start-ups are tech-savvy, ambitious, and out to dominate everything from fintech to food delivery to generative AI models. But compared to the US or even Japan, Korea’s support systems are, shall we say… less “BTS world tour,” more “public TV special.”
Codit’s CEO Jeong Ji-eun doesn’t pull punches. “We’re not an attractive environment to start a business—still! While global competitors get tax breaks, R&D freebies, and AI talent pipelines, we’re tangled up in old legal drafts and not enough institutional backbone,” she laments.
Yes, there are laws mandating that a portion of government tech adoption comes from start-up inventions, but enforcement is an afterthought: less than 3% of start-up products actually wind up in public sector hands. “Incentives matter more than regulations—make public institutions real partners, not reluctant customers.”

Start-Up Funding: The “Funnel of Doom”​

Getting funded in Korea isn’t a stroll by the Han River either. Pinda CEO Park Hong-min notes there’s angst at every stage: “Finding initial capital is tough, but the real squeeze sets in as your company matures. Your early investor’s money is drying up, but the exit market—unlike Silicon Valley’s robust M&A or IPO routes—remains worrying and, lately, stagnant.”
It’s a narrative that echoes across the start-up world: plenty of pitch decks, lots of hopeful seed rounds, then... the limbo of “fund maturity.” For Korean entrepreneurs, the pressure to find an exit or new growth path is more than just financial—it’s existential.

The Talent Trap: Stock Options with a Side of Sticker Shock​

Globally, start-ups compensate for their inability to out-muscle megacorps on salary by throwing stock options at top talent. In the US, it’s how Google, Facebook, and hundreds of others lured brilliant minds away from comfy IBM chairs or Wall Street gigs.
But Korean founders are stuck, says Channel Corporation’s Kim Jae-hong: “Our stock option regulations are a labyrinth. Taxes and rules mean that young start-up execs with little capital can’t even exercise their options, so the powerful incentive is lost in paperwork and up-front costs.”
Mompyeonhansesang’s CEO Jeong Ji-ye offers the real world view: “Every person counts at a start-up. Losing a talented parent to the childcare cliff is devastating. Big corporations can offer in-house daycare, but most start-ups can’t even begin to compete.” Japan, they note, makes governments issue ‘babysitter vouchers’ so even the smallest new businesses can keep bright minds engaged. Korea, she argues, needs to scrap the playbook and design a true work-life balance system tailored for agile teams—not just conglomerates.

Clouded by Regulation: Tech’s Irony of Innovation​

There’s more irony, if you want it. Start-ups, which thrive on cloud services, data, and breakneck global scale, are sometimes handcuffed by Korea’s security certification rules. Channel Corporation uses AWS for a simple reason—it’s virtually the only way to operate across Asia and America with a single infrastructure slate. Strict rules designed for local control and security actually make it harder for hot Korean software ventures to chase global customers.
Regulations around network separation—meant to protect data—are “old-world” headaches in a generative AI age, according to Park Hong-min. In their words, “it’s almost impossible to properly integrate new external AI magic, so our products are stuck in the slow lane while the rest of the internet zooms past.”

Government Support: Broad Promises, Narrow Delivery​

Here comes the real kicker: the Korean government loves to talk about supporting AI, and to its credit, has doubled down on investment. But representatives like Ellis Group’s Kim Jae-won point to a recurring complaint: “the devil is in the details.” Sure, grants exist, but cost-multiplying regulations—like forced redundancy in cloud architecture—jack up operating expenses and actually blunt competitive edge. The solution? “Pinset policy.” Translation: focus on targeted tweaks, tailored for real-world fast movers.
Another Achilles’ heel? Policy design. “Technical understanding among officials is low—it’s too easy for lobbyists or well-meaning but disconnected experts to create rules that veer wildly from on-the-ground realities,” Kim Jae-won says. “Add in boom-bust fads (remember the AI textbook crisis?), and it’s hard for start-ups to plan. We need a long-term policy compass—not knee-jerk tinkering.”

The Sector Shuffle: All Eyes on AI, Others in the Cold​

Mobition’s Shin Min points out another issue that might sound familiar to anyone who’s ever survived a government grant cycle: fleeting attention spans. Urban Air Mobility (UAM)—think drones or flying cars—was the government’s darling a few years ago, but then all hands swung to AI. “You can’t build a robust tech sector by picking one industry and ignoring the rest. Start-ups thrive on diversity. Let’s keep the support broad and steady, not just a spotlight that flickers from one hype train to the next.”

The Next Government: What Start-Ups Really Want​

If Korea really wants to lead in the global start-up sweepstakes, presidential promises need to get granular…and honest.
First: help companies go global. The “Miracle on the Han River” once meant hardware shipped around the globe. Now, as Channel Corporation’s Kim Jae-hong notes, software is king—yet almost none of Korea’s new software giants are making a dent outside the peninsula. “We need dedicated funding, regulatory reform, and actual cross-border support for tech companies to have a fighting chance in the world’s big leagues.”
Jeong Ji-eun, again not one for half-measures, puts it even sharper: “Start-ups are the future of Korea. They’re job engines, tax revenue boosters, innovation factories. But speed is their lifeblood—we need 100 regulations slashed in 100 days. Give us a fast track. Let’s fix what we can immediately, and let the market do the rest. Get administration out of our code.”

The Global Stakes: Why Korea’s Startups Matter​

Skeptics might sneer and say: aren’t all start-ups everywhere always asking for lighter rules and juicier state aid? Sure. But Korea’s case is unique. The country has already proven twice in recent generations that it can defy gravity: once with manufacturing (think Hyundai, Samsung, LG), and again with pop culture (K-pop, K-drama, even kimchi-flavored ramen making waves in Paris and LA).
Tech is the natural third act. Korea’s engineers, coders, and designers are already churning out world-class crypto apps, AI tools, fintech, gaming, and health tech platforms. The raw energy, the “let’s just build it and see,” the late-night ramyun-fueled code jams—those are present. The drag is bureaucratic, not cultural or technical.

The Regulatory Check-List for Korea’s Next Big Leap​

So what would a founder-friendly Korea actually look like?

1. Real, Enforced Public Sector Procurement​

If the law says public agencies must buy from start-ups, then… they actually do it, not just file paperwork and keep buying the usual suspects.

2. Stock Options sans Kafka​

Remake tax and exercise rules so that stock options work as intended: a wealth engine for risk-takers, not just another accountant’s migraine.

3. Daycare That Works for Brave New Parents​

If Japan and France can subsidize nannies and creches, Korea—birthplace of the “work-until-you-drop” chaebol—can surely innovate a support model for entrepreneurial parents, not just Samsung dads.

4. Cloud and Data Rules for the Real World​

Yes, guard against cyber threats, but don’t make local start-ups spend half their capital proving what AWS or Azure do by default. Redraft the rules for a world of borderless SaaS, not fortress mainframes.

5. “Pinset” Policies and Sector Nuance​

Every breakthrough doesn’t come from headline AI research. Keep grants, regulatory relief and policy attention broad enough for urban air mobility, medtech, food tech, and the next wave, whatever it may be. Bet on diversity.

6. Long-Term, Predictable Policy​

The presidency isn’t a hackathon—it’s a marathon. Start-ups need to make five-year and ten-year plans. That means rules, grants, and infrastructure investments can’t swing with political whim or regulatory fashion.

The Realpolitik of Start-Up Survival: Rhetoric vs Reality​

“Circle of Innovation” makes for excellent copy, but founders left on read by government agencies complain that most “dialogue” ends after the photo op. For policies to be worth more than the paper they’re printed on, they have to be co-designed with the very people who’ll use them. Otherwise, the disconnect between government and the front lines becomes a gaping chasm—filled with, at best, missed opportunities, and at worst, dead start-ups.
As government blueprints get finalized and the next president takes office, the most critical test may not be how many times someone says “innovation” on the campaign trail. It’ll be whether, in places like Gangnam’s Maru 360 or D.Camp, the regulatory chains finally get cut, and the “Circle of Innovation” is powered by legislation, not just inspirational hashtags.

Epilogue: Turning a Scream Into a Symphony​

The tale of Korea’s start-ups is not just a business story, but one of national identity—of whether an already hypermodern, globally-wired society can keep pace with the digital era’s demands. No more trickle-down support, chicken-and-egg regulation, or sectoral favoritism. Start-ups aren’t asking for special treatment; they just want the freedom to compete, to keep their best people, and to chase the global dream with fewer bureaucratic roadblocks.
Presidents, ministers, legislators: listen up. The next act in Korea’s fantastic development story is being written right now—not in campaign manifestos, but in conversations, code commits, and business pivots across a thousand glass-walled offices.
Will the country answer the scream with more red tape… or finally help its start-ups craft a symphony worthy of the world stage? Only the next 100 days—and the decade beyond—hold the answer.

---

Source: 매일경제 Ahead of the 21st presidential election, the start-up industry has poured out unwavering suggestions.. - MK