Microsoft’s internal culture has always been closely watched, scrutinized for any sign of shifting preferences or competitive doubts—especially when it comes to its never-ending rivalry with Apple. In a surprising turn of events, Merill Fernando, a senior product manager at Microsoft, recently ignited online controversy and conversation by publicly stating that he found Apple’s macOS to be “better” than Windows 11. This revelation, less a dogmatic assertion and more a tongue-in-cheek appraisal, has nonetheless sent ripples through both the tech community and Microsoft’s own base of users and employees. What does it mean when a high-ranking manager at Redmond’s core so openly praises the competition? How does this reflect on Windows 11’s current standing, and what can we glean about the real-world platform preferences of the very people building our digital lives?
At the center of the storm is a single tweet, couched in jest but definitive enough to garner widespread attention. “If Ballmer was CEO, I’d be fired for this tweet,” began Fernando, referencing Microsoft’s famously combative former leader Steve Ballmer. In the same breath, Fernando expressed his preference for macOS over Windows 11, using a viral meme involving Katy Perry as visual shorthand. The message, meant to be lighthearted, quickly found itself under the media microscope—demonstrating that even jokes from company insiders aren’t immune from corporate and public scrutiny.
Fernando’s tweet exploded, accumulating over 700,000 impressions and more than 11,000 likes, according to Neowin’s coverage. As with all viral content involving high-profile figures and sensitive topics, initial amusement gave way to serious questions: Was this simply a joke, or a symptom of deeper underlying frustrations within Microsoft? What does it say about cross-platform ecosystem usage, especially among the people creating these platforms?
For his personal projects, including podcasts, newsletters, and open-source endeavors, Fernando turns to a Mac Studio. Microsoft services, such as DevBox, are still very much in play, accessed remotely through the Windows App for macOS. When direct Windows functionality is needed, Fernando leverages virtualization solutions like Parallels Desktop to run Windows virtual machines—in essence, combining the best of both ecosystems as needed.
This workflow mirrors the increasingly hybridized productivity strategies seen across Silicon Valley and beyond: tools and platforms are chosen not for ideological reasons, but for their real-world efficacy in the hands of power users.
The revelation that a Microsoft product manager swears by a third-party macOS tool to maximize the experience of Microsoft’s own suite of applications should raise eyebrows among Windows loyalists. Raycast, currently macOS-only, is cited frequently among developer power users for its speed, extensibility, and ability to unify diverse workflows under one interface. The absence of a direct Windows counterpart (with similar community zeal) remains a pain point for many Windows enthusiasts and could be viewed as an area where Microsoft-based productivity could improve.
Microsoft’s own DevBox and Windows App for macOS exemplify how the company is actively building bridges—enabling users to access Windows-native environments from Apple devices, rather than trying to force complete ecosystem lock-in. Even the willingness to let employees choose their primary device signals a confidence that Microsoft’s value proposition lies less in exclusivity and more in service quality. In this environment, approaches that favor user choice often foster more honest feedback and robust innovation—although, as the viral tweet shows, they can also generate challenging PR moments for legacy brands.
Even so, Windows 11 continues to dominate the enterprise and consumer desktop landscape, powered by a legacy of software availability and broad device support. According to StatCounter’s latest data, Windows maintains over 70% market share in the global desktop OS arena, while macOS trails at around 15-20%. These numbers reflect both entrenched user bases and inertia, but also the challenge Apple faces in replicating the breadth—if not always the depth—of Windows’ software and hardware ecosystem.
Fernando’s comments thus neither herald the demise of Windows nor suggest mass defections at Microsoft. Rather, they highlight how even Microsoft’s own developers are keenly aware of where their own ecosystem falls short, particularly in the user experience, design, and developer tooling that Apple prioritizes.
It is worth noting, however, that Microsoft as a company has shifted markedly from the days of Steve Ballmer’s “burning platform” rhetoric. Under Satya Nadella’s leadership, the culture has become far less combative and more focused on interoperability, cloud-first software, and developer ecosystem expansion—even if that means running Office on iPad, or building key Azure tooling for Linux.
It is reported that Microsoft’s internal communications guidelines still caution employees about public comments on product preference, but a growing number of insiders suggest that honest, constructive criticism is more tolerated—if not outright encouraged—as part of daily engineering discourse. Some reports suggest this openness has fueled better cross-platform support and, paradoxically, improved the quality of Microsoft’s own flagship products.
Tech commentators like Tom Warren (The Verge) and Mary Jo Foley (ZDNet) have previously argued that Microsoft’s willingness to de-dogmatize employee workflows actually strengthens the company’s position as a serious player in a cloud-centric, multiplatform future. In online forums, the debate often circles around the way in which such admissions can catalyze improvements within the Windows ecosystem—fueling calls for features and polish that Windows power users currently admire in macOS.
User experience remains the competitive battleground. As hybrid work and remote development continue to be the new norm, the barriers between “Apple user” and “Microsoft user” are less defensible than ever. Microsoft’s decision to empower its own employees with their platform of choice is both a sign of internal confidence and a calculated risk, one that could pay dividends in both morale and insights into how Windows must evolve.
Whether this moment signals a new era of openness at Microsoft or simply reflects one employee’s workflow reality, the lessons are universal: Honest feedback, public or private, drives progress. In allowing its workforce—and by extension, its customers—to speak freely about rival platforms, Microsoft may yet discover the spark it needs for its next great leap forward. For now, the conversation continues, and users everywhere are better for it.
Source: Neowin Senior Microsoft manager says Mac is better than Windows 11
The Tweet That Sparked a Storm
At the center of the storm is a single tweet, couched in jest but definitive enough to garner widespread attention. “If Ballmer was CEO, I’d be fired for this tweet,” began Fernando, referencing Microsoft’s famously combative former leader Steve Ballmer. In the same breath, Fernando expressed his preference for macOS over Windows 11, using a viral meme involving Katy Perry as visual shorthand. The message, meant to be lighthearted, quickly found itself under the media microscope—demonstrating that even jokes from company insiders aren’t immune from corporate and public scrutiny.Fernando’s tweet exploded, accumulating over 700,000 impressions and more than 11,000 likes, according to Neowin’s coverage. As with all viral content involving high-profile figures and sensitive topics, initial amusement gave way to serious questions: Was this simply a joke, or a symptom of deeper underlying frustrations within Microsoft? What does it say about cross-platform ecosystem usage, especially among the people creating these platforms?
Workplace Pragmatism: Device Choice at Microsoft
Following the viral attention, Fernando clarified his position by describing his personal and professional device setup. Given the option by Microsoft to choose between a Windows PC or a MacBook for work, he selected a company-issued MacBook. This revelation itself is noteworthy: Microsoft’s internal IT policy allows its employees to choose between rival operating systems for daily use. This pragmatic approach highlights a growing trend within tech workplaces—platform agnosticism in pursuit of productivity and creativity, rather than dogmatic loyalty.For his personal projects, including podcasts, newsletters, and open-source endeavors, Fernando turns to a Mac Studio. Microsoft services, such as DevBox, are still very much in play, accessed remotely through the Windows App for macOS. When direct Windows functionality is needed, Fernando leverages virtualization solutions like Parallels Desktop to run Windows virtual machines—in essence, combining the best of both ecosystems as needed.
This workflow mirrors the increasingly hybridized productivity strategies seen across Silicon Valley and beyond: tools and platforms are chosen not for ideological reasons, but for their real-world efficacy in the hands of power users.
Efficiency Engines: Power User Tools in the Spotlight
Central to Fernando’s workflow is Raycast—a productivity tool for macOS that acts as a powerful command launcher, allowing seamless switching between Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Visual Studio Code, Terminal, and more, all enhanced by custom key remapping. For web browsing, Fernando differentiates between contexts: Edge for work, and Arc for personal browsing.The revelation that a Microsoft product manager swears by a third-party macOS tool to maximize the experience of Microsoft’s own suite of applications should raise eyebrows among Windows loyalists. Raycast, currently macOS-only, is cited frequently among developer power users for its speed, extensibility, and ability to unify diverse workflows under one interface. The absence of a direct Windows counterpart (with similar community zeal) remains a pain point for many Windows enthusiasts and could be viewed as an area where Microsoft-based productivity could improve.
The Broader Context: Platform Agnosticism Over Brand Loyalty
Fernando’s candid tweeting is emblematic of a broader, industry-wide trend: professional users increasingly demand platforms that enable productivity and creativity, regardless of who makes the hardware or writes the operating system. Among developers, designers, and multimedia producers, the historic boundaries between Mac and Windows have blurred. Virtualization, cross-platform app development, and cloud-based workflows make it easier than ever to cherry-pick the best of both worlds.Microsoft’s own DevBox and Windows App for macOS exemplify how the company is actively building bridges—enabling users to access Windows-native environments from Apple devices, rather than trying to force complete ecosystem lock-in. Even the willingness to let employees choose their primary device signals a confidence that Microsoft’s value proposition lies less in exclusivity and more in service quality. In this environment, approaches that favor user choice often foster more honest feedback and robust innovation—although, as the viral tweet shows, they can also generate challenging PR moments for legacy brands.
Windows 11: The View from the Inside
If a senior product manager at Microsoft is willing to publicly say that macOS beats Windows 11, what does this say about the current state of Microsoft’s flagship operating system? Since its launch in late 2021, Windows 11 has positioned itself as a modern, streamlined successor to Windows 10, emphasizing aesthetics, security, and a refreshed user interface. However, it has also drawn criticism for hardware requirements, compatibility pains, and periodic bugginess—issues that sometimes lead even longtime Windows fans to explore alternatives.Even so, Windows 11 continues to dominate the enterprise and consumer desktop landscape, powered by a legacy of software availability and broad device support. According to StatCounter’s latest data, Windows maintains over 70% market share in the global desktop OS arena, while macOS trails at around 15-20%. These numbers reflect both entrenched user bases and inertia, but also the challenge Apple faces in replicating the breadth—if not always the depth—of Windows’ software and hardware ecosystem.
Fernando’s comments thus neither herald the demise of Windows nor suggest mass defections at Microsoft. Rather, they highlight how even Microsoft’s own developers are keenly aware of where their own ecosystem falls short, particularly in the user experience, design, and developer tooling that Apple prioritizes.
The Strengths of macOS: Why Some Microsoft Insiders Prefer Apple
What aspects of macOS elicit such praise, even from Microsoft insiders? Several points stand out, corroborated by both user surveys and professional commentary:- User Experience and Consistency: Apple’s famed attention to detail in interface design, persistent keyboard shortcuts, and lifecycle support make macOS feel “smoother” and less fragmented than Windows.
- Developer Tooling: For engineers and creators, macOS has a generally superior reputation for open-source development tooling, terminal experience, and system stability. Apple’s Unix-based underpinnings are often cited as ideal for modern dev work.
- App Ecosystem: While Windows reigns supreme in sheer availability, the quality of pro-tier apps—especially in creative industries—often gives macOS an edge.
- Security and Privacy: Apple’s approach to system security, sandboxing, and privacy-first engineering is perceived as less intrusive (with fewer forced updates and telemetry popups) than in Windows 11, although this is an area of ongoing debate.
Where Windows 11 Triumphs: Compatibility, Customization, and Ubiquity
Despite recognition of macOS’s strengths, Windows 11 possesses critical advantages that continue to make it indispensable for millions. Several of these are echoed even by power users like Fernando:- App Compatibility & Legacy Support: Windows’ enduring legacy means that it runs a wider range of commercial and bespoke software, especially in corporate and industrial environments where mission-critical applications have yet to port to newer platforms.
- Hardware Diversity: Windows can be found on everything from $200 netbooks to $5,000 workstations and gaming rigs, giving users maximum choice and price flexibility.
- Gaming: The PC gaming ecosystem remains almost entirely Windows-centric, with better hardware support, game library, and accessory compatibility than macOS.
- Customization: From system-level tweaks to registry hacks and third-party shell replacements, Windows is far more open to user-driven modification than Apple’s tightly controlled platform.
The Risks of Candid Employee Commentary
The viral trajectory of Fernando’s tweet underscores not only the openness of modern tech culture, but also the risks associated with such candor. In a time when brand image is everything, any statement from an official spokesperson—even one intended as a joke—can swiftly be weaponized, mischaracterized, or blown out of proportion. While some celebrated the transparency of a Microsoft insider freely discussing his workflow, others interpreted it as an embarrassing self-own, or even as a sign of crisis within the Windows division.It is worth noting, however, that Microsoft as a company has shifted markedly from the days of Steve Ballmer’s “burning platform” rhetoric. Under Satya Nadella’s leadership, the culture has become far less combative and more focused on interoperability, cloud-first software, and developer ecosystem expansion—even if that means running Office on iPad, or building key Azure tooling for Linux.
It is reported that Microsoft’s internal communications guidelines still caution employees about public comments on product preference, but a growing number of insiders suggest that honest, constructive criticism is more tolerated—if not outright encouraged—as part of daily engineering discourse. Some reports suggest this openness has fueled better cross-platform support and, paradoxically, improved the quality of Microsoft’s own flagship products.
Community Reaction: Fans, Critics, and the Importance of Real-World Workflow
Reactions to Fernando’s tweets among the broader tech community have ranged from applause to incredulity. Some Windows diehards felt undermined by a senior team member’s defection; others celebrated the honesty and the reminder that, ultimately, the right tool is the one that gets the job done efficiently.Tech commentators like Tom Warren (The Verge) and Mary Jo Foley (ZDNet) have previously argued that Microsoft’s willingness to de-dogmatize employee workflows actually strengthens the company’s position as a serious player in a cloud-centric, multiplatform future. In online forums, the debate often circles around the way in which such admissions can catalyze improvements within the Windows ecosystem—fueling calls for features and polish that Windows power users currently admire in macOS.
Implications for Windows 12 and the Road Ahead
If anything, episodes like this remind Microsoft—and its most devoted fans—where the opportunities for improvement lie as the company considers the future of Windows. Insider reports and recent patent filings suggest that Windows 12 (or whatever the next iteration is named) will focus heavily on AI integration, “cloud-first” native experiences, and further UI refinement. Microsoft is keenly aware of the pressure to close the gaps not just with Apple’s macOS, but also with increasingly polished Linux desktops like Ubuntu and Fedora.User experience remains the competitive battleground. As hybrid work and remote development continue to be the new norm, the barriers between “Apple user” and “Microsoft user” are less defensible than ever. Microsoft’s decision to empower its own employees with their platform of choice is both a sign of internal confidence and a calculated risk, one that could pay dividends in both morale and insights into how Windows must evolve.
Conclusion: The Value of Candor, the Cost of Comparison
In summary, Merill Fernando’s headline-grabbing tweet says less about a deep rift within Microsoft than it does about the reality of modern software development and productivity: Tools must serve users, not the other way around. As the digital workplace accelerates toward device and OS agnosticism, the lines between Mac, Windows, and even Linux will continue to blur. While Windows 11 boasts strengths that keep it at the heart of global IT infrastructure, macOS’s polish, developer tooling, and coherence win fans even among those tasked with building Windows itself.Whether this moment signals a new era of openness at Microsoft or simply reflects one employee’s workflow reality, the lessons are universal: Honest feedback, public or private, drives progress. In allowing its workforce—and by extension, its customers—to speak freely about rival platforms, Microsoft may yet discover the spark it needs for its next great leap forward. For now, the conversation continues, and users everywhere are better for it.
Source: Neowin Senior Microsoft manager says Mac is better than Windows 11
Last edited:
